Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Board revisits policy barring same firm from serving as solicitor and negotiator; motion made to undo prior suspension

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board members debated undoing a recent suspension of Policy 0176, which states the board solicitor and labor negotiator should not be the same attorney. A motion to restore the policy was made and seconded and board members voted in a roll-call recorded in the public transcript; the board deferred deeper legal discussion to executive session.

A board member moved during the public meeting to undo a prior suspension of Policy 0-1-7-6, the district policy that states the solicitor and the negotiator should not be the same attorney.

The motion to rescind the suspension was introduced by a board member who told the meeting the policy “basically says our solicitor and our negotiator should not be the same attorney” and that they were not comfortable continuing without further advice from conflict counsel. Elaine seconded that motion.

Board solicitor Ari Schneider told the board the policy is not uniformly applied across districts and that the practice of using a…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans