Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the State Funding Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Legislative funding package sends capital and transportation dollars to Spokane County projects; PFAS and crisis‑center awards highlighted
Summary
County staff summarized state capital and transportation awards for Spokane County, including funding for a crisis stabilization center, PFAS well remediation, courthouse work, Plants Ferry, and transportation projects including the North‑South Corridor; staff flagged remaining questions about PFAS scope and project timing.
Get email alerts on the State Funding Projects topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Spokane County staff reviewed the 2025 state capital and transportation budget awards affecting the county and flagged several items of interest during an April 29 briefing.
Staff said the county received funding for several priorities the commissioners previously advanced, including courthouse improvements, a crisis stabilization center, Plants Ferry projects, and PFAS response dollars. Staff said PFAS funding will likely be used first to address the wells with the highest contamination levels and that the Department of Ecology indicated those funds can leverage additional state resources.
On transportation, staff highlighted numerous awarded projects in the county and advised commissioners to note which line items represent new money versus prior appropriations. Staff specifically called out the North‑South Corridor project and said they had not seen a delay in that program’s funding but could not confirm the construction schedule; one legislator’s newsletter cited a 2030 completion while others had earlier projections.
Staff also noted the Northeast Public Development Authority housing and childcare request received funding, but far less than requested (staff said the request was $3 million). Staff encouraged commissioners to review the full project list to identify local projects of interest and to follow up with staff for item‑level detail.
No formal board action was taken. Staff said more specificity on PFAS allowable uses and project requirements would be available at the department level and that they would coordinate with Ecology and local data sources to refine scopes and leverage additional funding opportunities.

