Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transportation Commission Coordination topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Flagstaff BAC presses for earlier, clearer input to Transportation Commission
Summary
Members of the Flagstaff Bicycle Advisory Committee urged the city to give BAC and PAC reports earlier on Transportation Commission agendas and explored ways to share draft minutes or summary comments before the commission discusses items.
Members of the Flagstaff Bicycle Advisory Committee urged City of Flagstaff staff to change how the committee’s feedback reaches the Transportation Commission so their comments come before, not after, commission discussion.
The recommendation came after BAC members described attending Transportation Commission meetings where the commission heard items and only at the end invited BAC or PAC reports. Chris Fair, transportation planner with the city, told the committee: “I like to give them feedback of what we're talking about before they discuss it so they can say, well, the BAC is all wrong, and here's what we think.”
Committee members said that when BAC feedback arrives at the end of a Transportation Commission meeting it is often untimely. BAC members proposed several practical fixes: having BAC/PAC reports appear earlier on the Transportation Commission agenda, attaching a one-slide summary of committee feedback to staff presentations, or transmitting provisional draft minutes or a short addendum in advance of the commission meeting so commissioners see BAC perspectives while they still are discussing the item.
Estella, a BAC member, suggested a concise slide in the Transportation Commission presentation noting the committees’ main points, saying that “if it’s a presentation that the city has developed, maybe there’s just one slide on feedback from BAC and feedback from PAC, like, at the beginning of the presentation just to set the tone.” Several members said draft minutes could be sent as “provisional” but cautioned that minutes occasionally require edits.
Committee members also discussed logistical options such as assigning a rotating BAC representative to attend Transportation Commission meetings and forwarding a short written summary when BAC meets close in time to the commission’s meeting. The group agreed to press for improved timing and an approach that preserves accuracy: if BAC sends draft minutes, the committee would label them provisional and allow the Transportation Commission to treat them as informal input rather than an official BAC position.
The committee did not adopt a formal policy at the meeting; members agreed to follow up with staff to define a mechanism for earlier transmission of BAC and PAC input and to request that staff explore adding a short “feedback” slide to relevant Transportation Commission presentations.
Members said better timing would help the Transportation Commission consider BAC technical input — for example, on micromobility and trail projects — before the commission takes votes.
The committee plans to pursue a practical, documented approach with City staff and to test sending a short written summary ahead of the next Transportation Commission agenda item for which BAC has prepared comments.
