Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Consent Agenda Zoning Approvals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Mesa planning board unanimously approves consent agenda, including three zoning items
Summary
At its March 12, 2025 meeting the City of Mesa Planning and Zoning Board approved its consent agenda, which included approval of minutes and three zoning items: the Longbow Shell industrial building, the Rosetta Room site and special use permit, and a recommendation for the Medina Station freeway landmark permit to City Council.
The City of Mesa Planning and Zoning Board on March 12, 2025, unanimously approved its consent agenda, which included approval of minutes from the Feb. 26 meeting and three zoning-related items, during a brief public hearing.
The consent agenda covered: a site plan review and special use permit for the Longbow Shell Building, described in the record as a roughly 7-acre parcel approximately 840 feet west of the northwest corner of North Recker Road and East McDowell Road and a 98,296-square-foot industrial building; a site plan review and special use permit for the Rosetta Room, listed as 0.4 acre at 104 East First Avenue for a commercial entertainment/coffee-shop and general retail development (transcript lists the building size as 66,150 square feet); and Item 4A, a recommendation to City Council on a Council use permit for a Medina Station freeway landmark/monument at the southeast corner of East Southern Avenue and South Signal Butte Road. Staff recommended approval of the listed items with conditions, and the board approved the consent agenda as presented.
There was no separate discussion of the items, and no public comment recorded in the transcript. A board member moved to approve the consent agenda; the motion was seconded and the board voted unanimously to approve. The board also received no additional staff updates and then voted to adjourn.
Because these items were on the consent agenda, the board did not debate conditions or amendments on the record at this meeting; the transcript shows the standard motion and vote procedure only. Item 4A was presented in the record as a recommendation to City Council, indicating the City Council will receive the board's recommendation as part of its review process.
