Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Local Roads topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs bids for Ryze Lane improvements; staff presented three water-line/road options
Summary
After hearing engineering cost estimates and resident input, council directed staff to seek bids for two designs for Ryze Lane: the full relocation/widening option and a lower-cost shoulder-widening alternative. Council asked staff to return with bid results.
Lancaster County Council gave staff direction to solicit bids for two options for Ryze Lane improvements after a lengthy discussion about costs, water-line relocation and long-term maintenance risks.
Public Works staff presented three engineered options and cost estimates. Option 1 would relocate an existing 2.5-inch water line out of the pavement, widen the roadway to 18 feet with roadside ditches and perform full construction; the engineered estimate for relocating the 2.5-inch line plus roadway work was roughly $580,500. Option 2 would upgrade the line to a 6-inch main to support a fire hydrant and make other connections at greater cost (total estimates ranged from about $920,000 to $1,130,500 depending on the tie-in location). Option 3 would be a lower-cost treatment involving shoulder widening and overlay (roughly $244,000–$250,500) but would leave the water line under the pavement.
Public commenters and several councilmembers said residents want the road widened as previously promised; other councilmembers and public-works staff warned that leaving distribution infrastructure under pavement increases the risk of later leaks and disruptive repairs. Public Works Director (staff—identified in the meeting as Mr. Cato) said option 1—moving the existing 2.5-inch line out of the pavement and widening to 18 feet—was the design that had been in the project packet and that the larger upgrade to 6 inches was the cost driver for higher estimates.
After discussion, Councilmember Jose Luis moved and Councilmember Graham seconded a motion to move forward to bid both Option 1 (relocate 2.5-inch line and widen to 18 feet) and Option 3 (shoulder widening/overlay) as bid alternatives so the county could compare actual bids. The motion passed unanimously. Staff said they will return to council with bid tabs and recommended action; they also noted that any unused proviso funds would be applied to the county’s next capital-sales-tax project (the detention center) per prior direction.
Council members emphasized the need to communicate with Ryze Lane residents during construction due to access and traffic-control impacts and to coordinate with the water/sewer district because utility relocation responsibility is now the constructing entity’s responsibility under state law.
