Board approves variance allowing larger, taller billboard after ADOT sound wall blocked freeway views

3144857 · April 29, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Maricopa County approved a variance expanding height and area for an existing legally nonconforming billboard on Black Canyon Highway after commissioners said a sound mitigation wall erected by ADOT had rendered the sign functionally invisible from I‑17.

The Maricopa County Board of Adjustment approved a variance to permit a larger, taller face for an existing legally nonconforming billboard located west of I‑17 near Anthem, concluding the sign’s functionality had been reduced after ADOT erected a sound wall that blocks freeway sightlines.

Joel (planning staff) told the board the sign was originally permitted in 2013 and was oriented toward Black Canyon Highway; after zoning text amendments in 2021 the billboard became legally nonconforming and staff recommended denial of an enlargement that would make the billboard visible from I‑17. The applicant argued the billboard was originally intended and permitted to capture freeway traffic and that the ADOT sound wall—outside the applicant’s control—had eliminated that functionality.

Bill Allison, representing the property owner and Lamar Advertising, said the wall had “completely blocked this sign from view” and asked the board to restore the sign’s functionality by permitting a 70‑foot height and a larger sign face. He also said the owner would remove illumination if the change were approved. Darren (staff) reviewed the ordinance changes that now require larger separation between billboards and outlined special‑use permit alternatives for relocation.

Member Clapp said the property owner had been harmed by the ADOT wall and that raising the sign was an appropriate remedy, especially since the applicant would remove illumination. After discussion the board voted 4‑0 to approve BA250006, subject to the conditions in the staff report.

The board discussed alternatives—relocation via a special‑use permit or a legislative entitlement—that would allow a billboard to be moved or altered without a time limit. Staff and the applicant agreed those options remain available if the applicant chooses not to pursue or to supplement the variance.