Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variances And Renewals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board of Zoning Appeals hearing officer approves multiple variances and short‑term rental renewals in Carmel — votes at a glance
Summary
The hearing officer approved multiple variances and short‑term rental renewals at a Carmel Board of Zoning Appeals hearing, adopting staff findings of fact and imposing conditions where noted.
Get email alerts on the Zoning Variances And Renewals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Board of Zoning Appeals hearing officer approved a series of petitions including short‑term residential rental renewals, sign and lot‑cover variances, a pool‑house height variance, a parking variance with conditions, and a residential garage setback variance.
Planning staff told the hearing that renewal applications for short‑term residential special exceptions are “generally entitled to favorable consideration” and that, for petitions reviewed that evening, planning and code enforcement had no unresolved complaints for the renewal sites. The department repeatedly recommended positive consideration and adoption of findings of fact for the items listed below.
Votes at a glance
- PZ202500057SE (Cadanas) — Renewal of short‑term residential rental special exception: approved; valid 1 year. Planning staff reported no complaints for the past year. - PZ202500058V (Reeder) — Pool house height variance (3‑foot increase to match 1880 house roof pitch); approved. Staff noted the accessory building will be located more than 150 feet from any side or rear lot line. - PZ202500059SE (Dooley / Otis Sampson Enterprises) — Renewal of short‑term residential rental special exception: approved; valid 1 year. Planning staff reported no code enforcement complaints during the prior year. - PZ202500060V (First Source Bank) — Monument (ground) sign variance (approximately 6 feet tall, ~29 sq ft, terracotta color): approved with staff conditions to address remaining review comments; landscape compliance confirmed in revised materials. - PZ202500061V (Lambert) — Lot coverage variance (13% increase requested): approved; engineering signed off on the request. - PZ2025000662V (Jackie’s Catering) — Parking variance (site requires 36 spaces per EDO; petitioner to provide limited on‑site parking and an access agreement to adjacent property): approved with condition that the petitioner record the executed access/easement agreement within 30 days and provide staff a copy. - PZ202500067SE (Ellis) — Renewal of short‑term residential rental special exception (duplex unit): approved; valid 1 year. - PZ202500068V (Smith) — Garage/setback variance to allow a 15‑foot rear setback instead of 20 feet (variance of 5 feet) to relocate garage egress to a different street for safety reasons: approved. Carmel Engineering required replacement of identified sidewalk panels on Cary Road as part of the project; right‑of‑way permit for the additional Linden Lane curb cut was issued.
Most of the items were routine renewals or variances with limited public comment; the hearing officer adopted the recommended findings of fact and approved the petitions with the conditions noted above where applicable. Planning staff repeatedly told the board that renewals are typically entitled to favorable consideration under the Unified Development Ordinance and that code enforcement reported no complaints on the renewal properties in the prior year.
Notable details from individual petitions include: First Source Bank said the monument sign is needed because medianed North Michigan Road restricts direct northbound access and wayfinding; Norma Reeder said her proposed pool house was designed to match the roof pitch of an 1880 Victorian farmhouse; Jackie’s Catering said the site is for catering operations and not for hosting events on site; and the Smiths said relocating their garage and driveway to Linden Lane addresses a safety concern on Cary Road. The engineering department reviewed grading and drainage plans for development items and reported no issues for the projects it reviewed.
The hearing adjourned after the approvals; in multiple cases approvals are valid for one year and require renewal filings to continue the special exceptions.

