Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Sustainability topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District previews $13.5 million Phase 1 sustainability plan with rooftop solar and a geothermal pilot

AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Administration told the board Phase 1 would include rooftop solar on five schools, a geothermal retrofit at Sauk Trail, and a district-wide energy-efficiency program, with an estimated cost near $13.5 million and a funding plan that will likely include borrowing plus federal rebates.

The Middleton-Cross Plains Area School District on Dec. 16 received a Phase 1 update on a multi-year sustainability roadmap that would add rooftop solar, pilot geothermal at one school and pursue district-wide energy-efficiency improvements.

Assistant Superintendent for Business Operations Jared Rosing, who presented the update, said the district engaged McKinstry to develop the roadmap and that Phase 1 currently includes rooftop solar on five schools, a retrofit at Sauk Trail to install geothermal wells, and a comprehensive energy-audit and building-envelope work across the district. Rosing said the estimated cost for Phase 1 is about $13.5 million and that figure is being refined.

Rosing told the board the district will pursue available federal incentives and rebates, citing roughly $2.8 million in potential direct-pay incentives from the Inflation Reduction Act that would be paid back to the district after systems go online, plus other rebate sources. He said a final Phase 1 plan and funding package will be returned to the board in January and that any borrowing to fund the project would require a board resolution and open a 30-day petition period allowing residents to seek a referendum.

Rosing said McKinstry will guarantee energy-savings projected in the proposal and the district and its bond counsel are developing a financing structure that aligns borrowing with those guaranteed savings. Board members asked about prioritization if the board chooses a smaller borrowing amount, use of one-time revenue streams such as a TIF closeout, and the timing of equipment replacement. Board member Bob Green suggested the district consider retirement of a tax incremental financing district as a possible one-time funding source.

Ending: Administration will return in January with a refined Phase 1 scope, updated cost estimates, a financing plan and analysis of prioritization if the full package is not approved.