Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Procurement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council directs city attorney to draft responsible-contractor ordinance; timeline set for August review
Summary
Councilmember Yanez asked the city attorney to prepare a responsible contracting ordinance to set minimum standards for city-funded construction work; councilmembers endorsed study and asked for a local-tailored draft to return to council in August.
Councilmember Yanez proposed a responsible contracting ordinance intended to raise standards on publicly funded construction projects by encouraging skilled trades, worker safety and apprenticeship opportunities. He described the measure as a 50/50 bidding approach that would not bar nonunion firms but would set parameters for quality and training.
"A responsible contracting ordinance levels the playing field for all contractors when bidding," Yanez said, framing the proposal as a way to ensure quality work, worker safety and talent development on city projects. He said apprentices can train while earning pay and cited union apprenticeship outcomes as an example of career pathways for local workers.
Several councilmembers expressed support for studying the idea but cautioned that the city attorney and staff would need time to review sample ordinances and craft language useful for Sterling Heights. City legal staff recommended a multi-step process of researching ordinances used elsewhere, vetting drafts with staff, and allowing council review. The city attorney told council the drafting and vetting process would likely take longer than the originally proposed two-week schedule; he advised two to three months to produce a vetted draft.
Councilmember Radke and others said they favored the concept but wanted a careful, Sterling Heights-specific ordinance rather than adopting another city's language wholesale. Concerns raised in the meeting included potential higher costs for city projects, whether the ordinance would limit the city's existing procurement flexibility, and how a mandate might affect contractors hired by a construction manager.
Council direction: the city attorney was asked to prepare and return a draft ordinance for council consideration in early August (first meeting in August), giving staff about 60to 90 days to research, draft and vet the proposal.
No formal ordinance language was presented or adopted at the meeting; the council only directed staff to prepare a draft for future discussion.
