Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Childcare Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council reviews draft code changes to expand commercial daycare locations, requests next steps

3137179 · April 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff presented a 0-reading informational update on proposed code amendments to allow commercial daycares by-right in certain nonresidential zones, add a 500-foot environmental-buffer evaluation and require hazard assessments; council directed staff to prepare an ordinance for future introduction.

Planning staff gave an informational (zero-reading) presentation on potential amendments to the Longmont Development Code to expand where commercial, state-licensed daycare facilities can locate and to add safety protections.

Planner Kristen Cody said the proposal would permit commercial daycare uses in two nonresidential zones — the primary employment (NPE) and nonresidential agricultural (NAG) zones — subject to site-specific safety review. The draft language would require an environmental-buffer evaluation within 500 feet of proposed sites, prohibit facilities from opening near identified, unmitigated hazards, and require a site-plan review for new developments (with a site-plan waiver option for existing buildings). The scope is limited to state-licensed commercial daycares (nonresidential buildings); residential and faith-based daycares would not be affected.

Staff said the change aims to expand access to childcare while protecting children and staff by following national best-practice guidance such as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s recommendation to avoid siting childcare near pollution sources. The city’s proposed environmental-buffer study would evaluate historical land uses, current business activities, physical contamination, hazardous building materials, and other risk indicators. Public-safety staff collaborated on the draft; early public-safety concerns prompted the buffer language and mitigation standards.

Council members asked clarifying questions about traffic, parking and examples from existing facilities; staff said those issues remain part of site-plan review and that the intent is to expand siting options without reducing safety. Council signaled support for staff to prepare a formal ordinance for introduction at a future meeting.

No ordinance vote was held; staff will bring a draft ordinance for formal introduction following further review and Council direction.