Conferees consider boosting Cass County courtroom grant, prefer routing funds through courthouse improvement fund

3136770 · April 26, 2025

Get AI-powered insights, summaries, and transcripts

Subscribe
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Cass County requested the state increase its grant for a courtroom build from $100,000 to $400,000 (with a local match) to help fund a $1.2 million courtroom project; committee members said they would prefer placing funds into the competitive Courthouse Improvement Fund rather than earmarking the money to a single county.

Representative Hansen told the conference committee on Senate Bill 2002 that Cass County is building a new courtroom to house judges added two years ago and requested an increase in the state grant from $100,000 (the Senate amount) to $400,000 with a match requirement; the county’s total project cost is about $1.2 million.

Chairman Thomas said the committee should consider appropriating additional dollars into the Courthouse Improvement Fund (CIF) rather than earmarking a larger direct grant to Cass County, because the CIF is a competitive program that serves all district courts and would avoid setting a precedent of one-off grants. Alex, a staff member, clarified the mechanics: if funds come from the general fund, the legislature would appropriate and transfer to the Courthouse Improvement Fund; if funds already sit in CIF, it could be a transfer.

Hansen described the Cass County request and asked the committee to consider a $400,000 state contribution with a 2-to-1 local match; Thomas said he would be “much rather” to appropriate to the CIF and noted a prior conversation had considered a $1.5 million infusion to that fund. Members expressed agreement to discuss that option at the next meeting and asked staff to draft amendment language once a final dollar amount and source are decided.

No formal vote was taken; conferees said they would reconvene and review draft language that could either increase the specific Cass County grant or appropriate a sum to the Courthouse Improvement Fund for competitive allocation.