Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

MDHHS, Milliman explain Medicaid capitation rate process as department seeks midyear adjustments

3130819 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and actuarial contractor Milliman briefed the House Appropriations Committee on Medicaid managed‑care capitation rate methodology, explaining why base data lag exists and why the department is seeking midyear adjustments, including a $55 million health‑plan adjustment cited by MDHHS.

The Michigan Department of Health and Human Services and Milliman told the House Appropriations Committee how Medicaid managed‑care capitation rates are developed, why base data are lagged, and what triggers midyear rate amendments as the department pursues supplemental adjustments to close fiscal‑year gaps.

Amy Eppke, senior deputy director of financial operations at MDHHS, said the department is committed to maintaining access to care while setting actuarially sound managed care rates. She told the committee that the department’s supplemental request for health plan services includes a $55,000,000 adjustment needed to close out fiscal year 2024 and to align rates for fiscal year 2025. MDHHS emphasized that capitation rates must follow federal rules and be certified by a qualified actuary and reviewed by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

Jeremy Cunningham and Chris Pettit of Milliman, the department’s actuarial contractor, walked the committee through the technical steps of capitation rate development. Key points they described: • Base data period and timing: certified capitation‑rate development typically uses a completed 12‑month historical period and, for the FY2025 rates discussed at the hearing, encounter and plan data from state fiscal year 2023 were used. That approach means base data commonly is two years behind the rating period because the state waits for a complete and reconciled historical year before projecting forward. • Steps…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans