Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Police Video Fee topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission backs draft policy to charge up to $75 an hour for police video requests, seeks council resolution

3124146 · April 25, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The commission voted to support a police department policy to assess up to $75 per hour to prepare body‑worn and cruiser video for release and asked staff to forward a resolution to city council for formal approval.

The Moraine Records Commission voted to support a draft policy from the Police Department to charge up to $75 per hour to prepare and redact body‑worn and cruiser camera video for public release and approved sending a resolution to the city council for formal authorization.

Police staff explained the change follows a new state law that allows municipalities to charge up to $75 an hour for processing requests for police video. The department’s draft policy would estimate the processing cost for a requester before completing redaction and release so the requester can decide whether to proceed.

The department described the workload involved: two staff members typically handle video requests and reviewers must watch footage in real time and then re‑review to ensure redactions were applied correctly. "So a 15 minute video is at least 30, if not longer, period of time for them to actually do this," a police representative said, describing why the fee offsets staff time.

Martinez, the law director, recommended that the records commission vote to support the policy so staff could draft a resolution to present to council. "Since it's dealing with charging the public, I thought that would be a better protection for the city in case anybody were ever to challenge the policy, we at least have council authorization on record via resolution," Martinez said.

The commission approved a motion to support the policy and forward a resolution to council. The commission clarified that payment handling would follow the city's usual process for fee‑based public‑records requests: the requester pays, staff forwards payments to finance, and finance processes receipts.

No changes to the fee amount or processing method were made at the meeting; the vote supported moving the policy forward to council for adoption by resolution.