Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Zoning Enforcement Penalties topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission advances zoning text amendment to add civil penalties, agrees to pursue follow-up enforcement changes
Summary
The commission voted to forward TXT062024 — an amendment to Article 20 to add a civil-penalty schedule and updated criminal-penalty provisions — to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of approval, and separately initiated further text amendments to address inoperable vehicles, trash, unmitigated vegetation and junkyards.
The Caroline County Planning Commission voted to forward TXT062024, a proposed text amendment to Article 20 of the zoning ordinance that adds a civil-penalty schedule and clarifies criminal-penalty language, to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of approval. Commissioners also voted to initiate a separate, follow-up package of zoning amendments to address outdoor storage of inoperable motor vehicles, outdoor keeping of trash and garbage, unmitigated growth of grass and weeds, junkyards and related enforcement housekeeping items.
Brad Robinson of the county planning department said the Article 20 changes mirror the allowances in the Code of Virginia for civil and criminal penalties (the presentation cited state-code provisions in the staff presentation). The draft establishes an initial civil penalty of $200 for a first summons, allows escalation of civil penalties to $500 for additional summonses, and sets an aggregate civil-penalty cap consistent with the state limit cited in staff materials. Robinson said criminal-penalty language is included for more serious violations causing injury or where civil penalties would exceed the state cap; the draft specifies escalating fines consistent with the state code language noted in the staff presentation.
Robinson told commissioners that the amendment before them is focused on Article 20’s penalty language and does not itself adopt separate definitions or new standards for inoperable vehicles, trash or vegetation. He said the county intends to bring a second text-amendment package — to be drafted and reviewed at a future meeting — that will propose specific regulatory changes for inoperable vehicles, outdoor storage, unmitigated vegetation and related issues raised during public comment.
During the public hearing, Mary Hodge, a Bowling Green–area resident, described persistent inoperable-vehicle and outdoor-storage issues on an adjacent property in the Bowling Green district and urged stronger penalties and enforcement. Robinson and other staff explained that current code contains requirements that inoperable vehicles be screened or stored in enclosed buildings and that a property with multiple inoperable vehicles could meet the county’s definition of a junkyard. Staff advised that some equipment and farm vehicles may be exempt from licensing requirements and that clarifying definitions will be included in the planned follow-up amendment.
Commissioners approved forwarding TXT062024 to the Board of Supervisors with a recommendation of approval by voice vote. Later in the meeting the commission made a separate motion to initiate the drafting and consideration of amendments addressing inoperable motor-vehicle storage, outdoor trash/garbage, unmitigated vegetation, junkyards and enforcement mechanics; that initiation motion also passed by voice vote. Staff said follow-up amendments will be prepared for a future meeting and will include definition clarifications and recommended enforcement language.
