Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Elementary Schedule Pe Recess topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Glen Ellyn SD 41 to propose more daily PE and added unstructured play for elementary students
Summary
District administrators told the board they’ve re-examined the elementary schedule and plan to add daily physical education (aligned with guidance for 150 minutes per week) and to codify 30 minutes of supervised unstructured play by slightly lengthening lunch periods.
Get email alerts on the Elementary Schedule Pe Recess topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A team led by Dr. David Bruno and staff presented a proposed change to Glen Ellyn School District 41’s elementary schedule that would increase physical education frequency and formalize additional unstructured play time for grades 1–5.
Dr. David Bruno, introduced as presenting with a team of administrators, said the idea grew from staffing and program-planning for the new kindergarten center and a committee convened to examine whether elements of the kindergarten day could benefit older elementary grades. Chris and other committee members told the board they reviewed prior minutes and staffing models dating back to 2017 and consulted physical education teachers about expanding PE to five days per week, consistent with the common recommendation of 150 minutes per week.
“All of the experts recommend 150 minutes a week, which is 5 days a week,” a staff member told the board. Presenters also referenced “recent legislation that requires 30 minutes of unstructured, supervised but unstructured play” and said the district intends to codify that requirement by adding roughly five minutes to lunch periods, preserving the required supervision while increasing unstructured playtime.
The presenters said the Glen Ellyn Education Association (GEA) was consulted and supports being part of the conversation; staff emphasized the proposal was developed over about seven months with teachers, administrators and district office staff. They described educational reasons for the change, including daily movement’s benefits for classroom behavior and team building, and noted the PE teachers were “very interested” in expanding daily delivery.
Presenters said schedule engineering and staffing changes are required to implement daily PE and the small lunch extension and noted human-resources and building schedules were part of the seven-month review. They did not present a final board policy or a formal motion at the meeting; the presentation was framed as an informational update and committee report with further work to come.
Board members were given an opportunity to ask questions and were told more detailed scheduling models, staffing implications and timelines would be returned to the board for consideration. No formal vote or adoption occurred at the meeting.

