Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Bill would define ‘immediate danger’ for child-protective temporary orders, sponsors say

3117266 · April 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Representative Kim Wallen and the Oregon Law Center told the Senate Judiciary Committee April 24 that House Bill 2,613 A would give courts clearer criteria for issuing temporary protective orders for children by adopting standards similar to the Family Abuse Prevention Act.

The Senate Judiciary Committee heard testimony April 24 on House Bill 2,613 A, a measure that codifies criteria a court must use when deciding whether a child is in “immediate danger” and whether a temporary protective order is warranted.

Sponsor Representative Kim Wallen said the bill borrows the Family Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA) standard so courts have a clearer, consistent framework when children — rather than the adult parties — face present risk. The committee overview said the bill directs courts to consider whether the child faces…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans