Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the School Security topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Security measures at Penfield schools draw mixed reactions from board candidates
Summary
Candidates at a Penfield Central School District forum discussed recent security measures, including metal detectors, contracted guards and proposals to involve local law enforcement, with some calling the steps reactive and others urging broader community input on long-term security planning.
Recent changes to security protocols for some district events were a point of contention at a Penfield Central School District candidate forum, with candidates split over contracted security, armed guards and the role of local law enforcement.
James Ashby described entering the forum under heightened security and criticized what he called a reactive approach: "We're sitting in a room with 7 security guards right now, and 1 of them is carrying a gun. To get into this room, I had to go through a metal detector... None of that's necessary," he said, adding concerns about cost and the district's reliance on outside contractors.
Susan Gilbert Collins said the district's recent security steps were "wise and necessary" given the need to act quickly, praised the new safety and security coordinator and urged the board to consult teachers about what training or equipment they would find useful. "I would like to hear from teachers, what they want and need to feel more prepared in the event of an emergency," Collins said.
Dr. Scott Wilson acknowledged security concerns and said he was "not super excited" about an armed guard but recognized the district may need short-term measures and recommended addressing gaps in coverage for after-school activities. Nate Chienenko and others urged a less polarized, committee-driven approach to determine the appropriate security profile and to include community voices and booster organizations in planning.
Candidates discussed alternatives such as involving the Monroe County Sheriff's Office and the value of officers who can also serve educational and community roles; James Ashby said prior coordination with the sheriff had been effective in earlier years. No candidate proposed specific, board-adopted security policies during the forum; the discussion focused on immediate reactions and preference for a more measured, consultative process going forward.
Ending: Candidates agreed on the importance of safety but differed on how to balance immediate protective measures with longer-term planning and community involvement.
