Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Historic Preservation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board reviews three historic‑preservation incentive requests; grants and tax rebates to go on consent
Summary
Trustees discussed three homeowner applications for preservation incentives under the village's historic-overlay program, each seeking a $10,000 exterior grant and (for two properties) a village-share property tax rebate of roughly 7% over five years.
The Hinsdale Village Board on April 22 reviewed three applications for historic‑preservation incentives under the village's Historic Overlay District and discussed the program's budget and pipeline.
Staff told trustees the Historic Preservation Commission unanimously recommended grant awards and, where applicable, a property-tax rebate equal to the village's portion of real-estate taxes (approximately 7%) for up to five years after verified completion. The three applicants discussed were 213 S. Clay Street, 306 E. First Street and 518 S. Garfield.
Details discussed in the meeting:
- 213 South Clay Street: estimated project cost ~$275,000 for a rear addition, finished basement, interior renovations and other work. The HPC recommended relief for floor-area ratio and lot-coverage; staff summarized the request as a $10,000 grant and approximately $4,400 in tax-relief (the five-year village portion estimate).
- 306 East First Street: an exterior restoration project of about $71,000 that includes porch replacement, tuckpointing, brick and limestone repairs. HPC recommended a $10,000 grant and an estimated $13,000 cumulative tax relief over five years.
- 518 South Garfield: a smaller slate‑roof replacement with an estimated cost of $24,000; HPC recommended the $10,000 grant without tax relief.
Staff reviewed the program's budget history: grants approved in 2023—2024 totaled $100,000 across 10 projects (but only about $10,000 actually paid so far, reflecting multi-year construction schedules). The board has budgeted $50,000 for grants per year; if the three awards are approved as requested, staff said the grants through 2025 would total $40,000 and the village would have roughly $10,000 in grant capacity remaining for the year.
Trustees discussed program design and policy tradeoffs: whether to preserve the accelerated review and FAR relief while reducing financial incentives, or to keep the grants and tax rebates. Staff noted that some applicants said the incentives were the deciding factor in choosing rehabilitation rather than demolition.
All three incentive items were placed on a future consent agenda for formal approval, pending conditions such as completion of work and final inspections.
