Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Micromobility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Hinsdale first reading updates code to match state rules on scooters, limits one‑wheelers and clarifies e‑bike rules
Summary
Trustees reviewed an ordinance amendment aligning Hinsdale's rules with new Illinois law: low‑speed electric scooters permitted off the business district for users 18+, limited to 10 mph; other personal mobility devices would be prohibited and electric bicycles regulated by wattage and location rules.
Get email alerts on the Micromobility topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
On April 22 the Hinsdale Village Board held a first reading of a proposed amendment to village code chapters concerning low‑speed electric scooters and personal mobility devices to align local regulations with recently enacted Illinois law.
Staff explained the amendment would permit low‑speed electric scooters consistent with state law — operation on streets or sidewalks is allowed outside the Central Business District with a top speed of 10 mph and an operator age minimum of 18 years. The proposed draft would also prohibit other personal mobility devices such as one‑wheel boards, electric dirt bikes and electric skateboards throughout the village because of safety and speed concerns, staff said.
Bicycles without motors would remain governed by state provisions: allowed on streets and sidewalks except in the Central Business District where sidewalks are prohibited for bicycles. Electric bicycles were discussed as well; state law defines an electric bicycle as having pedals and limits motors (commonly to 750 watts), and staff proposed applying the state classes and wattage guidance. Staff also recommended ordinance language prohibiting alteration or concealment of battery wattage markings to assist enforcement.
Deputy Chief Lilly and trustees discussed enforcement approaches: warnings for minors with parental notification, and citations for repeat offenses or for riders of driving age. Trustees agreed the second reading should proceed on consent so the village can communicate the changes to residents before school ends.
The board did not adopt the ordinance on April 22; the item will return for a second reading.

