Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Professional Learning topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District 25 outlines multi‑year professional learning plan and links early kindergarten gains to sustained teacher learning
Summary
District presenters described a multi‑year, curriculum‑aligned professional learning system — including onboarding, SIP days, instructional coaching and a new literacy micro‑credential — and presented early kindergarten MAP gains the district links to sustained training and the move to full‑day kindergarten.
Arlington Heights School District 25’s Department of Student Learning presented a detailed review of the district’s professional learning system at the April 22 school board meeting, describing a shift from one‑time professional development toward sustained, job‑embedded professional learning tied to curriculum implementation.
Presenters described a multi‑year program review cycle (research, develop, implement, refine) that integrates institute and SIP (school improvement) days, instructional coaching using a student‑centered coaching framework, onboarding for new staff, optional catalog courses (D25 University) and a district micro‑credential in early literacy aligned to LETRS and the new HMH Into Reading curriculum.
Why it matters: Board members had asked earlier for clarity on time, effectiveness and impact of professional learning. District leaders framed the approach around research‑based standards (Learning Forward, John Hattie, Thomas Guskey) and gave early evidence tying sustained professional learning and full‑day kindergarten implementation to measurable student gains.
Early impact data highlighted by the district: kindergarten students showed larger fall‑to‑spring percentile gains in reading and math in 2024–25 (the district’s first year of full‑day kindergarten) after teachers participated in roughly 14.5 days of sustained professional learning over three years. The district presented maps of percentile shifts and cited increases the presenters described as notable (math: ~6 percentile‑point gain; reading: ~10 percentile‑point gain from the prior year). Presenters emphasized that while the full‑day model itself contributed to outcomes, the sustained, curriculum‑aligned professional learning prepared teachers to use the additional instructional time effectively.
Program structure and investments: the district reported it currently budgets roughly $987 per full‑time‑equivalent employee annually for professional learning (excluding substitute coverage). That amount covers required state trainings, institute and SIP days, coaching, onboarding, District 25 University offerings and the new micro‑credential work. Instructional coaching was highlighted as a high‑leverage, job‑embedded strategy; the district shared teacher feedback saying coaching led to earlier and clearer understanding of student needs in math instruction.
Next steps: the district will pilot the summer micro‑credential in foundations of literacy instruction and return to the board with additional metrics. Board members asked for a follow‑up session and were offered a return presentation in May so the board could engage more deeply with questions.
Ending: District leaders asked the board to continue supporting time and funding for sustained professional learning and implementation supports such as coaching and program review planning; presenters said the approach is intended to improve instructional consistency, teacher capacity and student outcomes over time.
