Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Taxation topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board of Equalization approves three property valuations, schedules other appeals for May 1
Summary
Oklahoma County—oard of Equalization voted to set fair-market values on three residential properties at hearings today and deferred decisions on multiple other appeals to May 1. Three motions passed unanimously; several contested commercial and residential appeals were continued for a written decision.
The Oklahoma County Board of Equalization set fair-market values on three properties and deferred several contested appeals to its next meeting on May 1.
At today—oe proceedings the board approved three motions to establish values for individual properties after brief presentations and agreement between appellants and assessor representatives. Board chair Miss Thompson said decisions will be mailed: "We will make our decision next Thursday, May 1, and you will be notified by mail," a statement repeated for multiple cases.
Votes at a glance: - BOE 90 (agenda item 3): Board set fair-market value at $1,255,309. Motion recorded and approved with votes in favor by Towne, Sellers and the chair. - BOE 5 (agenda item 2): Board set fair-market value at $464,000 after the assessor and the appellant agreed on a lower figure; Towne, Sivers and the chair voted yes. - BOE 808 / BOE 80 (agenda item 4): By agreement the board set the fair-market value at $159,000 using sales the appellant provided; the motion carried with Sellers, Towne and the chair voting in favor.
Several contested items were continued or deferred. For example, residential appeals where homeowners disputed comparable sales or post-sale remodel adjustments were carried over to the next meeting for a written decision. Commercial appeals that raised valuation method disputes were also not decided today.
Board process and notification: The board emphasized it is an appellate body and will not normally accept new evidence at the hearing unless the assessor agrees. Chair Miss Thompson repeatedly stated that formal decisions would be issued in writing after the board meets on May 1.
Ending: The board met further to hear additional telephonic appeals and to schedule remaining commercial hearings. Appellants and assessor staff were told to expect mailed notices of the board ecision the week of May 1.
