Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the River Monitoring topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee discusses low‑cost river gauges and National Weather Service integration
Summary
Vernon County alliance members reviewed options for river‑level monitoring, including USGS gauges and lower‑cost IntelliSense units; members favored testing lower‑cost systems that can feed data to the National Weather Service while county staff will follow up with Monroe County and the NWS for operational details and costs.
Alliance members spent time reviewing options to expand river‑level monitoring in Vernon County, with discussion focusing on technical and budget tradeoffs and whether the National Weather Service (NWS) or the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) should host or display the data.
The choices discussed included USGS gauges (higher installation and annual maintenance costs) and lower‑cost commercial systems such as IntelliSense (lower upfront and annual fees). County staff said USGS installations can cost roughly $14,000 to install with annual maintenance near $5,500; IntelliSense‑type systems were described on the provided vendor list as having lower installation costs (roughly $3,000) and nominal yearly fees (example noted around $85), though participants noted those figures may be out of date and installation costs can vary.
Why it matters: real‑time gauge data helps emergency managers and the public detect rising water and issue warnings, and having data available through the National Weather Service map provides broader visibility during flood events.
Key discussion and steps Participants noted that Monroe County uses IntelliSense gauges and has integrated those stations with the NWS map; county staff reported generally positive experience and recommended contacting Monroe County staff and the NWS for specifics on installation, costs and data hosting. Members identified the Kickapoo River and West Fork as priority areas for initial deployment.
Several funding options were raised, including grant opportunities and local fundraising (county staff mentioned a local “power of 100” philanthropic model that could supply up to $10,000 for a nominated project). Alliance members favored beginning with a modest pilot to test lower‑cost sensors and follow up with a report to the committee.
Decisions and next steps The alliance agreed to direct county staff to: 1) contact the National Weather Service to confirm current NWS procedures for integrating third‑party gauges and hosting data, 2) follow up with Monroe County about their deployment and costs, and 3) develop a short plan identifying two priority deployment sites for a pilot project (Kickapoo and West Fork). No purchase decision was made at the meeting.
Ending: Staff will return with more precise cost estimates and a proposed pilot plan; members emphasized that a testing approach will inform scale, placement and budgeting.
