Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Santa Fe ARC approves two archaeologist listings, clears two PNM monitoring plans with trenching condition

3107926 · April 24, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At a meeting of the Santa Fe Archaeological Review Committee, members approved two individual listings for work in city archaeological districts and approved two utility monitoring reports/plans for the Public Service Company of New Mexico; the committee added a condition requiring full documentation if contractors trench instead of bore.

The Santa Fe Archaeological Review Committee (ARC) approved two individual listings and cleared two monitoring reports and plans for Public Service Company of New Mexico (PNM) at its meeting, taking voice votes on each action and adding a condition that any trenching be fully documented.

The approvals will allow the newly listed individuals to be used on projects that require qualified archaeologists in the city’s River and Trail, suburban and downtown archaeological districts. The committee also accepted a retrospective monitoring report and a proposed monitoring plan from PNM’s contractors, adding a stipulation that any switch from boring to trenching must be profiled and recorded in the field record.

Why it matters: Listings place qualified individuals on the city’s approved roster for municipal projects and private contractors working inside historic archaeological districts. Approval of monitoring reports and plans governs how subsurface utility work is recorded near sensitive resources; the committee’s added condition is intended to ensure that unplanned trenching does not go undocumented.

The actions taken

- Case 20259905 — Listing: The committee approved listing Chelsea Winter on the city’s roster for the River and Trail and suburban archaeological districts. Committee members questioned the applicant about supervisory experience, state permitting and whether the applicant appeared on professional directories. The applicant described her field and laboratory experience and…

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to keep reading

Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.

  • Unlimited articles
  • AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
  • Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
  • Follow topics and more locations
  • 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat
30-day money-back on paid plans