Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Personnel Cdl Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
School board discusses paying for CDLs with service requirement to retain bus drivers
Summary
Board members discussed a proposed policy to pay for Commercial Driver’s Licenses for new bus drivers in exchange for a two- to three-year service commitment, with repayment if the employee leaves early; HR, legal and the union would be involved before any policy is implemented.
A school board member said the Clay County School Board should consider a formal policy to pay for Commercial Driver’s Licenses, or CDL training, for new bus drivers and require a multi-year service commitment in return.
The board member said the district already sometimes pays for CDLs and suggested structuring an agreement similar to some health-care training contracts: "If we pay for a CDL license, we should have our bus drivers serve a minimum of two years," the board member said, adding that if a driver leaves earlier they would repay part of the cost. She noted typical CDL training costs are "somewhere in the 3 to $4,000 ballpark."
The board member framed the idea as a staff retention measure amid regionwide competition for CDL drivers from private employers. She said the board has discussed repayment schedules in which employees who leave within a set period would refund a portion of training costs (examples mentioned during discussion included repayable amounts in the $1,000–$1,500 range), and likened the arrangement to police and medical training commitments used elsewhere.
Board members repeatedly stressed the policy would require further review by human resources, labor negotiators and the school board attorney before it could apply to hires. The speaker said legal counsel confirmed such agreements can be lawful but that any program would require formal board policy and union consultation and likely apply only to new hires.
The board member asked staff to return with implementation details: eligibility, exact training cost, a proposed service term (two years was her minimum suggestion, with three years discussed), repayment schedule, and how the district would recoup funds if an employee leaves early. She suggested staff attempt to have a policy ready for new hires by August and emphasized the district should avoid applying an agreement retroactively to current employees.
Board members noted district hiring needs fluctuate with the economy and that payback mechanisms must be practical given bus drivers’ wages; one member observed that recovering training costs could take new drivers months. The board requested that HR, legal and operations prepare draft language and cost estimates for a future meeting.
No formal motion or vote was recorded on the topic during the meeting. The discussion ended with staff direction to research details and return recommendations to the board.
