Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Legislative First Readings topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council reviews multiple first readings and consent items including food-assistance resolution, SID plan receipt and contract extensions
Summary
Councilors listed several first-reading resolutions and consent items: Resolution 56-25 on lead-paint hazard standards, 57-20-25 opposing federal/state food-assistance cuts, grants and contract extensions, a water-main replacement project, receipt of the Cedar–Fairmount SID five-year plan, and two real-estate items referred to Planning & Dev.
During the April 21 meeting the Cleveland Heights City Council ran through a series of first readings and consent items and indicated committee referrals for two land transactions.
Items mentioned at first reading included: Resolution 56-25 (described in the packet as related to lead-based paint hazards and a 2018 model agreement); Resolution 57-20-25, a councilmember-sponsored resolution opposing proposed federal and state cuts to food-assistance programs (council discussion noted interest in expanding the language to cover impacts on local organizations); 58-20-25 (an ODAP-related resolution); and other resolutions authorizing the mayor to execute contract extensions for citizen services and authorizing specific infrastructure work such as a water-main replacement on Altamax.
The council acknowledged receipt of the Cedar–Fairmount Special Improvement District (SID) five-year plan; law staff advised that once a SID plan is in force the district cannot be expanded midterm and that expansions are normally handled only at renewal. Council also noted two real-estate items (one 0.54-acre parcel on South Overlook Road, described as two lots, and a separate 16-acre purchase) and said both would be referred to the Planning and Development Committee for review.
Councilors also discussed a proposed resolution responding to potential cuts to Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds and noted local organizations are watching federal developments; a councilmember said no specific CDBG cuts had yet been announced but that city staff and regional partners have been monitoring the issue.
Direction: the council referred the real-estate items and two other matters to Planning & Development and left other first-reading resolutions to proceed through the usual committee and second-reading processes.
