Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision AmSource topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DRC recommends AmSource five‑lot commercial subdivision with conditions
Summary
The Santaquin Development Review Committee recommended the AmSource five‑lot commercial subdivision move to the Planning Commission, subject to several conditions including a recorded cross‑access easement with Big O Tires, fire apparatus turning‑radius changes, and relocation of a fire hydrant.
Get email alerts on the Subdivision AmSource topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Santaquin Development Review Committee recommended that the AmSource five‑lot commercial subdivision be forwarded to the Planning Commission with conditions, after DRC members raised access, fire‑safety, and easement concerns.
DRC members said the developer must resolve a cross‑access easement with Big O Tires and address fire‑apparatus turning radii and hydrant placement before any site plan approvals. The committee voted to recommend approval; no opposing votes were recorded.
The subdivision is a preliminary application for a commercial development adjacent to Big O Tires along Main Street and Highland Drive. Staff and reviewers confirmed the plat as shown meets city code in broad outline but recommended several red‑line corrections and conditions prior to recording and prior to any site plan approval for individual lots.
Fire Department reviewers said multiple turns in the proposed internal access road include a 90‑degree corner and a short radius (R12) that will not accommodate large apparatus. Fire staff asked the applicant to either provide swept‑path templates for the specific truck model or to redesign curves to provide larger radii (fire staff suggested R20 as preferable). They also asked for an additional hydrant north of the Lot 1 stub so there is hydrant coverage on both sides of the open area and asked that the hydrant shown on Main Street be shifted south and out of a below‑grade berm so it is accessible to fire apparatus.
City administration and planning staff said the plat should show a cross‑access easement for the internal private road to ensure future owners will have access and to avoid ownership disputes if lots are sold in phases. Staff indicated the easement and other red‑line comments should be satisfied prior to scheduling the application with the Planning Commission; they said site plan approval for individual lots will also require executed documents where applicable.
The DRC motion to recommend approval included conditions: address red‑line comments, revise road radii/emergency access so fire apparatus can maneuver, and move the Lot 1/Main Street hydrant south into a more accessible location on the east side of the lot. The motion was seconded and carried; the item will advance to Planning Commission after the listed comments are addressed.
The committee also noted the applicant has been in discussions with UDOT about potential future widening of Main Street and the I‑15 overpass; staff asked applicants to account for that potential future work in grading, slope easement, and retaining wall plans.
The DRC emphasized storm‑drain inspection ports and isolation rows for private infiltration systems and said those details must be shown and constructed to permit future maintenance.
The item will be scheduled for Planning Commission review after the applicant submits the revised plat, recorded cross‑access easement language where required, and any other outstanding red‑line corrections requested by staff.

