Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Superintendent Search topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board narrows superintendent search to top 10, sets video interview step after debate over transparency
Summary
After a lengthy discussion about process and transparency, the board approved moving 10 candidates forward in the superintendent search and directed staff to request short introduction videos and answer set questions from those applicants.
The Lake Wales Charter Schools Board approved proceeding with the top 10 candidates in the superintendent search and set a multi-step interview process that will begin with applicant video introductions.
Trustees debated whether to advance 10, 11 or more applicants after the selection committee presented a blind scoring process. Interim Superintendent Doctor Johnson said the selection committee had narrowed a field to the top 11 because the 10th and 11th candidates were separated by a very small fraction of a point; the committee had originally planned to advance 10. Several trustees urged strict adherence to the previously announced blind-scoring plan to preserve transparency; others asked that the board allow additional near-tied candidates to submit brief videos so trustees could see and hear them before calling finalists.
After discussion the board amended an initial motion and voted to move forward with the top 10 as the next phase. Trustees then approved a follow-up plan: the board will notify the advanced candidates and request a recorded introduction (five to ten minutes, not to exceed 10 minutes) answering a set of questions supplied by the committee chair (questions to include at least one tailored to why the candidate wants to lead Lake Wales Charter Schools). Candidates will have one week to submit the video; the board will have at least one week for review and will schedule a special meeting (or use the May regular meeting if scheduling conflicts make a special meeting impractical) to pare the pool to finalists for in-person interviews.
Board members emphasized legal and fairness safeguards for the public narrowing process. Counsel was asked to prepare guidance on permissible topics and wording for the public discussion used to select finalists. The board discussed using video submissions to reduce travel and expense for out-of-area candidates and described a later phase of one-on-one interviews and final board vote.
