Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Union Certification Decertification topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
House committee debates supervisory exclusions, unit certification and petition thresholds in labor omnibus bill
Summary
Members of the House General and Housing Committee discussed whether supervisory employees in the judiciary should be excluded from bargaining‑unit eligibility, how the Vermont Labor Relations Board determines unit certification and whether the threshold to trigger decertification elections should be raised from 30% to a higher level.
Committee members and legislative counsel discussed three interconnected subjects in S.125: whether supervisory employees should be excluded from bargaining units, how the Vermont Labor Relations Board (VLRB) approaches unit certification, and the petition threshold that triggers decertification elections.
Sophie Cadetney of the Office of Legislative Counsel explained VLRB standards for evaluating proposed bargaining units, saying the board examines factors such as community of interest, potential over‑fragmentation and reporting structures. “Do the folks in the proposed bargaining unit... have a community of interest?” Cadetney asked, describing the board’s fact‑intensive review. She also recited the statutory definition used for a confidential employee, noting it is an employee “who has responsibility, knowledge, or access to information relating to collective bargaining, personnel administration, or budgetary matters that’s incompatible with that employee’s membership in or representation by an employee organization.”
Committee members debated process and policy. Some members supported striking “supervisory” from the list of exclusions so the VLRB can decide on specific units; others worried that small supervisory groups would be inappropriate or confidential. Testimony from union representatives urged the board be allowed to make fact‑based determinations rather than an across‑the‑board exclusion. One witness, an association director, said the VSEA opposed creating a bargaining unit in the described manner.
The committee also discussed petition thresholds used to trigger decertification elections. Under current law, a petition signed by 30% of a bargaining unit triggers a decertification election; several committee members and witnesses argued that repeated 30% petitions can be disruptive and proposed raising the petition threshold. Committee members debated whether the petition threshold should match card‑check levels used for certification (a 50%+1 card threshold in recent changes) or remain lower to preserve employee rights to trigger elections. No final decision was made; members said they would continue discussion and collect further testimony from the VLRB and other stakeholders before markup.
