Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Ordinances Referral topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council refers multiple ordinances to committees including property-assessment changes, county property listing, USGA-related permissions and film production
Summary
Allegheny County Council introduced and referred several ordinances to standing committees. Items include changes to property-assessment governance, a public listing of county properties available for sale, acceptance of a USGA donation and related parking use at Hartwood, and a request to authorize film production company use of county property.
Allegheny County Council introduced a set of ordinances and referred each to the appropriate standing committee for further consideration.
The council clerk read Ordinance 13497-25, an amendment to the county administrative code addressing separation of duties in the property-assessment appeals process and responsibilities of the Office of Property Assessments; the item was referred to the Committee on Assessment Practices. Council also introduced Ordinance 13500-25 to amend Article 701 (grounds, properties and buildings) to require a publicly accessible listing of county property that may be available for sale; that measure was referred to the Committee on Public Works.
Two items involving the United States Golf Association were read: Ordinance 13501-25 authorizes acceptance of a financial donation from the USGA (referred to Budget and Finance), and Ordinance 13502-25 authorizes use of Hartwood parking facilities by the USGA for U.S. Open parking (referred to the Committee on Parks). Another ordinance, 13503-25, would allow Rare Leo Productions LLC to use certain county-owned real and personal property in connection with filming; that was also referred to the Committee on Parks.
Why this matters: referrals signal the next stage of review. The property assessment item would change governance or administrative structure for appeals; a public listing of county properties could increase transparency around surplus-property sales; USGA-related items and film-use permissions are examples of one-off authorizations that can affect county property operations.
Details and next steps: Council did not take final votes on these ordinances at this meeting; each item was assigned to committee for hearings, testimony, and potential amendment. The transcript did not include ordinance text, fee schedules, or committee hearing dates.
