Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Municipal Finance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council asks CFO to clarify callable-bond language; deferral motion withdrawn after explanation

3095820 · April 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Spokane City Council members pressed staff for clarification about language in several ordinances that would allow the city to refinance callable bonds if market conditions change.

Spokane City Council members pressed staff for clarification about language in several ordinances that would allow the city to refinance callable bonds if market conditions change. Council members raised concerns about whether the ordinances could extend bond terms or pre-approve future borrowing without final terms.

City finance staff explained the mechanics. Matt, identified in the meeting as the city’s CFO, told the council that the city cannot change the terms of publicly voted bonds: “No. We can't. Because it's a, it's a, it was a publicly voted bond, so you can't change the terms of the bond.” He said the ordinances would allow the city to refinance callable bonds if market conditions make that advantageous; he described a rule-of-thumb target of about 3 percent for refinancing and said net present value savings for some issues would likely be above $1 million after refinancing costs are included. Matt stated that, given current market conditions at the time of the meeting, refinancing was not advantageous but that the authority would let staff “pull the trigger once the conditions are right.”

Council member discussion produced two formal outcomes recorded in the agenda review: an amendment to Ordinance C-36666 was adopted after a motion and voice vote; and a separate motion to defer Ordinances C-36663, C-36664 and C-36665 for three weeks was withdrawn by unanimous consent after CFO clarification. Council asked for final terms and parameters; staff said the refinancing authority would be exercised only if the net present value savings met thresholds and after staff analysis.

The city attorney and council presided over several procedural votes that temporarily suspended the usual one-week deferral rule so the amendment could be considered at the same meeting. Those procedural suspensions were recorded as approved by voice vote during the agenda review.