Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Redmond 2050 Code Part3 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council committee previews Redmond 2050 code package Part 3: design standards and housing amendments to return for May study sessions
Summary
Planning staff presented the Part 3 code package for Redmond 2050—design standard updates, zoning cleanups and housing amendments including middle housing implementation and changes to the neighborhood residential payment-in-lieu structure; staff plans study sessions in May and will return with a signed Planning Commission recommendation.
Planning Director Helland and staff updated the Parks and Environmental Sustainability Committee on April 22 about the Redmond 2050 code package Part 3, which focuses on design standards, modernization of standards and housing amendments intended to implement middle housing and comply with recent state laws.
Becky Fry (planning staff) said the draft includes a significant reformatting of design standards to support transition “from suburb to city,” added clarity on applicability and alternative design compliance, and new cross-references to the Green Building Program and incentive tools. Staff conveyed that the Planning Commission recommended further work to create a clear approval process for unique, landmark or iconic buildings, especially in centers and cultural districts.
Ian Lefkort (planning staff) summarized the housing amendments as three buckets: middle housing implementation, statutory compliance, and residential adjustments and cleanups. He told the committee that two substantive changes in the package adjust the neighborhood residential payment-in-lieu (PIL) approach: consolidating three separate per-square-foot PIL rate categories into a single uniform rate (equal to the current detached-dwelling PIL) and proposing a phased-in payment schedule to ease short-term developer impacts. Staff emphasized these changes aim to reduce administrative confusion and incentivize early adoption; the Planning Commission’s recommendation was expected to be signed the day after the committee meeting and staff will hold study sessions in May.
Councilmembers asked for concise materials ahead of the study sessions, expressed interest in how changes affect affordability targets from the comp plan, and requested slides or summaries explaining the PIL consolidation and phase-in. Vice President Forsyth asked about tariffs and mass-timber durability; Councilmember Stewart requested clarity on cultural-district design compliance and how the package will produce distinct outcomes in cultural districts. Staff said final adoption would come later (noted June adoption timing) and that staff would refund earlier payments if council adopts the proposed phased approach and it applies to fees paid during the transition year.
Ending: Staff will present the code package at study sessions in May and return with signed Planning Commission materials and a draft fee ordinance that phases in the consolidated PIL.
