Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Act250 Accessory On Farm topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee weighs Act 250 changes for accessory on‑farm businesses and special‑event permits
Summary
The committee discussed replacing the 50% qualifying‑product sales test for Act 250 exemptions with a revenue threshold of $250,000 (CPI‑adjusted) and adding an exemption for educational, recreational or social events held on farms; members flagged potential redundancy and asked for drafting input from the accessory‑on‑farm expert.
The Senate Agriculture Committee on April 23 considered proposed changes to Act 250 exemptions for accessory on‑farm businesses and a separate special‑event permit pathway for on‑farm educational, recreational and social events.
Under current law cited in committee discussion, accessory on‑farm businesses qualify for an exemption when more than 50 percent of their total sales are qualifying agricultural products. The draft discussed by counsel would replace the sales‑share threshold with a revenue threshold: an accessory on‑farm business would be exempt if annual sales from that business do not exceed $250,000, with the chair of the board authorized to adjust the threshold for inflation using the consumer price index.
Committee counsel said the draft would also create a new exemption (or an explicit exception) for on‑farm events that feature agricultural practices and qualifying products — educational, recreational or social events — and would authorize the district commission to issue a special event permit for such events. Members warned the two sets of provisions could conflict or be redundant and urged the drafter to coordinate with the accessory‑on‑farm expert identified in the meeting (Ellen).
Committee discussion focused on whether changes to Act 250 permitting should cover construction of improvements that normally trigger Act 250 review (for example, new structures or roads). Counsel noted Act 250 primarily operates as a reactive enforcement regime: the land use board or district commission typically assesses whether a permit was required after construction occurs, rather than proactively issuing enforcement actions before construction.
Members asked staff to consult with the accessory‑on‑farm expert to reconcile overlapping provisions, to refine the exemption language for improvements, and to return revised drafting for further testimony.
