Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Audit Performance topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Legislative auditors give Alpine School District a favorable performance review; 13 recommendations, district pledges follow-up

3089014 · April 23, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Office of the Legislative Auditor General (OLAG) presented a systematic performance audit that praised district performance and recommended improvements; district officials described the audit as positive and outlined next steps, including a presentation to the education subcommittee.

The Office of the Legislative Auditor General (OLAG) completed a systematic performance audit of Alpine School District and presented findings to district leadership, who briefed the board on the report and the district's planned responses.

Superintendent Farnsworth and Joel (district staff leading the audit response) told the board the auditors spent several months in the district, interviewing staff, visiting schools and reviewing data. District leaders described the audit as "favorable," and said the auditors characterized Alpine as a district that performs well while identifying areas for improvement.

Why it matters: the audit is a comprehensive, external review of district performance and operations. The OLAG report will inform district priorities and is a public record that the Legislature and other oversight bodies use in their oversight work.

Major findings summarized by district staff: - Achievement and peer comparison: OLAG found Alpine's overall proficiency rates among the highest in the state and reported that, compared with peer districts (the audit cited Davis and Jordan), Alpine outperformed those peers on proficiency measures. At the same time, the audit noted Alpine had not yet met the state's new proficiency targets. - Achievement gaps: auditors documented persistent achievement gaps for some student groups and recommended the district continue to target supports for low-achieving groups; district staff said this aligns with their existing coherence-map strategic planning and PLC priorities. - Best practices: OLAG highlighted district practices it considered exemplary, including the district's administrator-mentoring program and the use of professional learning communities (PLCs) that focus on student data and collaborative instruction. Auditors said other districts could learn from Alpine's approach. - Strategic planning/coherence map: auditors praised the district's strategic plan (referred to in the report as the coherence map) and found high awareness among administrators; staff reported 96 percent of school administrators said they knew the plan and how it guides practice, and about 57 percent of faculty and staff said the plan guided decisions at the school level. - Internal controls and safety items: auditors found internal controls to be generally adequate but recommended improvements, including closing incomplete fencing at some elementary sites that border public parks and updating policy language around bullying to align with practice and statute. - Administrative costs: OLAG reviewed superintendent and district administrative costs and placed Alpine's superintendent salary and administrative-per-pupil metrics in context within the state's reporting.

District response and next steps: staff said they agree with the recommendations, that the 13 audit recommendations are consistent with the district's existing priorities, and that they will implement the recommended follow-up steps. District leaders said OLAG presented the report to legislative leadership and that the district will appear before the education subcommittee (staff said they expect a hearing on or around June 15) for follow-up questions.

Questions from board members during the briefing focused on whether auditors recommended monitoring risks during the district's planned split into three districts; staff said auditors did not identify core risks that would complicate the split, but urged the new districts to retain the best practices identified by OLAG.

Ending: district staff said they appreciated the auditors' professionalism and that the audit validated much of the district's work; the full 92-page report was provided to the board and is available to the public.