Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use Subdivision Grandview 4014 topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Memphis council holds appeal over proposed Grandview Avenue subdivision for 30 days
Summary
After more than two hours of presentations and objections, the City Council held an appeal of a Land Use Control Board decision that would subdivide 4014 Grandview Avenue. The council voted to hold the matter for 30 days to allow further negotiation between neighbors and the applicant.
The Memphis City Council on April 22 held, for 30 days, an appeal of a Land Use Control Board approval to subdivide 4014 Grandview Avenue into two single-family lots.
The appeal, filed as case S24-41 by neighbors represented by attorney David Wade, asked the council to reverse the LUCB decision. The council heard presentations from neighborhood representatives and the applicant’s attorney, followed by a staff report from the Division of Planning and Development.
David Wade, identifying himself as counsel for the appellants, told the council that “since this is an appeal, it's heard on the record only as to what happened in the Land Use Control Board, and you all acted in judicial capacity. So you're deciding whether the Land Use Control Board acted properly or acted arbitrarily and capriciously.” He and other speakers argued the LUCB relied on inappropriate out-of-jurisdiction precedent and inaccurate exhibits when approving the major subdivision.
Chloe Christian, a planner with the Division of Planning and Development, disagreed with the appellants' assessment. Christian said staff found the application consistent with the Memphis 3 plan and that “staff agrees that these criteria are met,” noting the proposed lots maintain the 112-foot platted building setback and exceed minimum R-10 bulk requirements. She told council the proposed lots (about 0.78 and 0.77 acres each) are within the range of lot sizes in a 500-foot analysis used under the Unified Development Code.
Josh Whitehead, attorney for the applicant, said the proposal meets the UDC metrics and mirrors an existing two-lot pattern across the street. He told the council the parties had negotiated conditions and that the conditions approved by the Land Use Control Board reflected those attempts at compromise. Whitehead said the petition circulated in opposition included factual errors and stressed that most lots within 500 feet are smaller or narrower than the proposed new lots.
Council members asked clarifying questions about lot sizes, notice, petition counts and whether prior nearby subdivisions had gone through the same review process. Speakers for the neighborhood said 21 homeowners signed a petition opposing the subdivision (about 29% of the properties that received notice), and that maintaining a large magnolia and addressing a low, flood-prone northeast corner were central concerns. The applicant's side said 90% of the petition signers live on lots smaller or narrower than the proposed lots and urged approval.
After extended discussion, Councilman Smiley moved to hold the item for 30 days to allow the parties additional time to negotiate; without objection the council voted to hold the appeal until the May 20 meeting. Council members and staff said the body would be prepared to take a final vote at that later meeting.
Why it matters: The decision affects lot pattern and redevelopment pressure in an East Memphis neighborhood near the University of Memphis. The case pits neighborhood character and local drainage/topography concerns against property-owner development rights under the Unified Development Code.
What’s next: The council’s hold gives both sides time to attempt a negotiated settlement or to supply supplemental evidence to the record before the May 20 meeting, when the council said it would be prepared to vote.
