Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Appellate panel to decide whether Walmart trespass notice was admissible in burglary conviction
Summary
An appellate panel heard arguments in State of Tennessee v. William C. Sutton over whether a Walmart trespass notice that said "life" was admissible as evidence; the court took the case under advisement and will issue an opinion.
An appellate panel heard oral argument in State of Tennessee v. William C. Sutton over whether a Walmart trespass notice stating the defendant was banned for “life” should have been admitted at trial and whether, without that exhibit, there was sufficient evidence to support a burglary conviction.
The issue matters because the defense contends the document was hearsay and that, without it, the state lacked proof that Sutton knew he lacked consent to enter the store. The state says the defendant signed the document, the signing was explained to him by a witness, and video evidence shows him entering the store and removing items.
Jackson Fenner, attorney with the Knox County Bar representing appellant William Sutton, argued the…
Already have an account? Log in
Subscribe to keep reading
Unlock the rest of this article — and every article on Citizen Portal.
- Unlimited articles
- AI-powered breakdowns of topics, speakers, decisions, and budgets
- Instant alerts when your location has a new meeting
- Follow topics and more locations
- 1,000 AI Insights / month, plus AI Chat

