Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Curriculum Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board discusses Illinois PACE middle‑school mandate and questions funding, metrics and curricular fit
Summary
District staff presented the Illinois Post‑Secondary and Career Expectations (PACE) framework and the board discussed how to integrate the unfunded mandate into Glenview’s middle-school curriculum, including concerns about reporting metrics, time in the school day, and possible collaboration with Glenbrook South.
District staff presented the new Illinois PACE (Post‑Secondary and Career Expectations) framework and described implications for sixth through eighth grades. Staff said the mandate is unfunded and largely framed in terms of “exposure” and “support” rather than prescriptive “shall” language, which leaves local districts discretion in how to deliver the material.
Presenters told the board much sixth-grade material (growth mindset, social‑emotional learning) aligns with existing curriculum, but noted the district will need to add or repackage materials for eighth grade, where career interest surveys, financial literacy and stronger career-preparation pieces are expected. Staff said they will consult middle-school teachers, encore and life-skills curricula, and the high school (Glenbrook South) to identify reusable assets and avoid duplicative work.
Board members raised several substantive questions: how the state will audit or measure “exposure and support,” whether extracurricular career days would satisfy requirements, and how to measure outcomes prospectively. A board member suggested using ongoing district survey and data processes to create measurable baselines and track progress rather than reacting after audits. Another member expressed frustration that the mandate is unfunded and will require finding minutes in an already full schedule.
Staff said the PACE requirements will be incorporated into the curriculum review process, shared with middle-school staff, and kept on file for future audits; the state’s audit process and the ISBE Student Assistance Commission resources were cited as guidance. No formal board action was taken; the item was a discussion and planning step.
