Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission to revisit EDA membership after warning it could affect grant eligibility
Summary
Commissioners debated rescinding the county's withdrawal from the regional Economic Development Agency (EDA), with staff warning state rules and prior attorney guidance could make reentry difficult and could affect eligibility for certain grants; the item is scheduled for the May 5 agenda.
Get email alerts on the Economic Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners discussed whether the county should reinstate membership in the regional Economic Development Agency (EDA) after a prior two‑year withdrawal notice. The discussion focused on potential grant eligibility risks if Loudon County remained out of the EDA and on unequal cost‑and‑representation arrangements among the county and two cities.
One commissioner said the county had received warnings that withdrawing could make the county ineligible for certain state grants; others said the risk language was unclear as to whether it would affect all state grants or a narrower set of grants cited by Public Chapter 1101. Staff and attorneys said there are at least two attorney general opinions interpreting the statute and that the county could lose eligibility for some grants if it did not maintain a joint economic development agency, but acknowledged there is no definitive case law that answers every question about reentry.
The commission reviewed current EDA funding shares that staff described as roughly $177,000 from the county, $32,000 from Lenoir City and $35,000 from Loudon City. Commissioners said representation on the EDA board does not align with financial contributions in some cases, and one commissioner argued the agreement requires unanimity of the three entities to change terms, which makes local renegotiation difficult.
Nut graf: The EDA issue pits concerns about local control and perceived value against legal and grant risks tied to state statutes and past interlocal agreements; commissioners agreed to place the item on the May 5 agenda to consider rescinding the county’s withdrawal and to get more analysis.
Some commissioners expressed frustration with the EDA's perceived benefits to the county, while others cautioned that loss of eligibility for state grants could have broad consequences, possibly affecting infrastructure, public safety and other state funding. Staff said some grants in hand recently were city grants, but that a pending $2.5 million grant for sewer work and other potential funds could be implicated depending on legal interpretation.
Ending: The commission agreed to place reinstatement of EDA membership on the May 5 agenda. Commissioners requested more legal and financial analysis about what grants, if any, would be at risk and what consequences reentry or continued withdrawal would have.

