Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commissioners reduce $350,000-plus lien to $3,500 to enable prospective rehabilitation sale
Summary
Seminole County commissioners approved reducing a 2008–2018 code-enforcement lien on a probate property from about $350,540.19 to $3,500 after staff said the property had been brought into compliance and a prospective buyer pledged renovation.
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Seminole County Board of County Commissioners voted April 22 to reduce a longstanding code-enforcement lien assessed on a property originally cited in 2008 to a negotiated amount of $3,500 to enable a prospective purchaser to complete a sale and rehabilitation.
Alexis Valle, code enforcement clerk, told commissioners the lien arose from violations cited in October 2008 for trash, debris, uncultivated vegetation and other unsightly matter. The code enforcement board ordered compliance in early 2009; staff said the property was brought into compliance on Sept. 6, 2018. By staff calculation the lien had grown to roughly $350,540.19, exceeding the 2024 assessed value of the parcel.
Phil Capro, attorney for the prospective purchaser, said the current owners inherited the property through probate in 2024 and did not cause the long-running violation. Prospective buyer Elliot Grimes, who identified himself as a general contractor, told the board: “My intention on the property is to pull permits and revamp the property — new roof, new plumbing, electrical, air conditioning — and bring it back to a home that can be lived in.”
Commissioner Gallari moved to grant the requested reduction to administrative costs; Commissioner Hurr proposed and succeeded in amending the motion to increase the payment amount to $3,500 rather than the lower administrative-cost figure. Commissioner Constantino seconded the amendment. The motion passed unanimously.
Deputy county staff told the board the deputy county manager had found criteria that did not bar a reduction: the current owners did not cause the violations and a prospective purchaser had demonstrated intent to restore the property. The board’s final action authorizes the chair to execute a satisfaction of lien upon payment of the approved reduced amount.

