Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Dilapidated Properties topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Seymour council delays several dilapidated‑property orders, agrees conveyances and short extensions

3058454 · April 18, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

At its April 17 meeting the Seymour City Council tabled multiple public‑hearing actions for properties where certified notices were not verified, accepted two conveyances, and granted short remediation windows for owners actively working to secure buildings.

The Seymour City Council on April 17 tabled multiple enforcement actions tied to dilapidated structures after staff said certified‑mail return receipts were missing for several property owners, accepted two conveyances for small lots and set short remediation deadlines for owners already making repairs.

City staff said they could not locate certified‑mail return receipts for notices tied to properties historically listed as 803 North Murray (historically 807 North Murray), 301 South May and 311 North Stratton, and recommended retargeting or reissuing notices. “I could not find the return receipt on that certified letter,” the code enforcement staff told the council, which led the council to table those items for re‑notification and review at the next meeting.

Why it matters: State law requires notice by the tax roll for property proceedings, and the council paused actions where staff could not show the notice requirements were met. That preserves property owners’ procedural rights while the city reissues notices.

Most important actions and follow ups - 803 North Murray (historically 807 North Murray): tabled for reissue of notices after staff acknowledged the tax roll lists the lot as 803 and the certified notices were not documented. Staff said the city will resend notices and revisit the item next month. - 301 South May: tabled after staff reported no return receipt; reissue and re‑hearing next month. - 311 North Stratton: tabled for reissuance; staff will re‑notify and return the item to the next agenda.

Conveyances and remedial deadlines - 711 North Packet: Council approved accepting conveyance from the property owners and scheduled the conveyance process to begin July 1 (motion carried; vote recorded in the meeting as in favor). - 207 North Bantou: Council approved accepting conveyance of the lot from the owner whose husband had died and who lives out of state; staff calls it an inexpensive cleanup if accepted. - 401 East Ryman: Owner Aldo Hopkins told council he had “been working on it all day and night,” and the council granted a 90‑day remediation extension to allow the owner to complete securement and repairs; staff will send written notice confirming the 90‑day schedule.

Code enforcement options reiterated City staff summarized the remedies the city can pursue when a structure fails minimum standards: owner‑remediation and securing (boarding and sealing), city abatement with cost recovery billed to the owner, or city conveyance and demolition followed by competitive bid to restore the lot to the tax roll. “It can be boarded up… the other option is to have the city tear it down for you, and we’ll bill you for our pricing,” staff said.

Owners and public comment Several property owners addressed the council during the public‑hearing slots. One resident disputed an address used in legal notice and said she did not receive a certified letter; the council agreed to reissue notices to the tax‑roll address and to call affected owners directly.

What to expect next Items tabled for lack of documented notice will return next month after staff reissues certified mail and updates the record. For properties with accepted conveyances, staff will begin conveyance paperwork on the dates the council set.

Ending note: The council emphasized procedural fairness — resending notices where certified‑mail records were missing — while also using conveyance and short remediation windows to move long‑running dilapidation cases toward resolution.