Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Immigration Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents and students urge Hamilton County board to oppose SB0836/HB793 and stand for access to education
Summary
Multiple speakers — immigrants, students and teachers — urged the board to oppose Tennessee bills SB0836 and HB793 that they said would endanger undocumented students’ access to public education and remove federal and state funding; speakers cited Plyler v. Doe and a recent Supreme Court decision.
Residents, teachers and students urged the Hamilton County Board of Education to oppose proposed state bills identified in public comment as SB0836 and HB793, saying the measures would deny access to public education for undocumented students and create serious fiscal and human costs.
A teacher who said she represents English learners detailed enrollment figures and argued the bills would be costly to administer. “There are over 6,000 English language learners currently enrolled in Hamilton County Schools,” the speaker said, adding that the student population speaks “over 400 plus languages at home.” The speaker warned that processing documentation could cost the district millions if some ELL students were excluded from enrollment.
Student speakers, including several who identified themselves as immigrants or children of immigrants, asked the board to send a clear message of inclusion. One speaker who said she is a graduate of Hamilton County Schools and came from Mexico urged the board to “stand on the right side of history” and to welcome all students regardless of origin. Speakers repeatedly referenced Plyler v. Doe (1982), the Supreme Court case that bars states from denying free public education to undocumented children, and one commenter cited a recent Supreme Court decision as context (referred to in public comments as “Trump v JGG 2025”).
Several speakers framed the bills as both unconstitutional and wasteful of legislative time and local resources. A student government leader warned that excluding students from school would also cut off access to meals, counseling and other supports and could push families into economic instability.
Ending: Speakers asked the board to adopt a pro‑access stance and to use its influence with local and state elected officials; the board did not take formal action during the session but scheduled a listening session for further public input.
