Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Preservation Code Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff proposes expanding administrative COA approvals; commission supportive
Summary
Staff presented proposed zoning text amendments to expand staff-level Certificate of Appropriateness approvals for certain accessory and rooftop work; commissioners broadly supported the change and staff will route amendments to Planning Commission after legal review.
Get email alerts on the Preservation Code Amendments topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
City staff briefed the Green Bay Landmarks Commission on proposed text amendments to the city’s preservation code (which lives in the zoning code) intended to expand the types of work eligible for staff-level Certificates of Appropriateness.
Staff member Stephanie (noted in the meeting as coordinating the changes) told the commission the proposals would clarify who can issue COAs and would add several categories to the staff-level approval list: unattached accessory structures (even if visible), replacement siding with identical siding, commercial signs, installation of cellular utility equipment, rooftop alterations not visible from the public right of way (for example solar panels and skylights), and repair or replacement of decks, porches and balconies not visible from public right of way. Staff said the intent is to streamline straightforward cases that historically have required little discussion at full commission meetings.
Commissioners asked about the appeal and review path if staff denies a COA or if a proposed project is “fuzzy.” Staff explained that applicants can appeal staff denials to the commission; staff said it also plans to consult the commission informally when uncertain. The meeting record shows staff has rarely denied staff-level COAs to date and typically requests additional information when a submittal is incomplete.
Staff said the proposed amendments have been reviewed by Shippo (staff-level review) and are consistent with requirements for the city’s Certified Local Government (CLG) status; next steps are review by the city law department and placement on Planning Commission and City Council agendas as needed.

