Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Mobile Home Exceptions topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board denies Willow Springs mobile-home request after neighbors cite neighborhood character
Summary
A special-exception request to place a mobile home at 6549 Willow Springs Drive was denied after multiple residents said the unit would harm neighborhood character and property values; applicant represented by Jermaine Castillo said the unit was intended as temporary housing until a house could be built.
The Montgomery City Board of Adjustments voted to deny a special exception to place a mobile home at 6549 Willow Springs Drive after extended public comment from neighbors who said such a unit would be incompatible with their subdivision.
Jermaine Castillo, representing property owner Marcelino Castillo, asked the board to allow a mobile home “behind the tree line” as temporary housing while the family saved to build a permanent house. Castillo said the property includes other homes and some mobile units further down the road and that the family planned to build a house in the front in the future.
Multiple neighbors opposed the request at the podium, citing perceived harm to property values and neighborhood character. One resident told the board, “We have spent our lifelong earnings to afford such a place. . . . Immediately, our value or our houses go to 0 because there's a mobile home there.” Other speakers described the area as composed of large, two-story homes and said allowing a mobile home would set an undesirable precedent.
Board member Diane Burke moved to deny the request “based on the character of the neighborhood,” and Quentin Burke seconded. The motion to deny carried; the transcript indicates the board voted in favor of denial but does not record a roll-call tally on the record.
The board’s decision was grounded on neighborhood character and the evidence presented at the hearing. The applicant and supporters noted the unit was intended as temporary; members of the public raised concerns about precedent and property values. The denial means the applicant may reapply or seek other remedies under city rules, or appeal the decision per the code's procedures.
Speakers included the applicant's representative Jermaine Castillo and multiple residents who identified themselves as homeowners in the Willow Springs area. The board reminded speakers that its authority is limited to zoning relief; other concerns would have to be addressed through code enforcement or separate permitting processes.
No monetary penalties or conditions were recorded at the meeting. The applicant may seek further guidance from Planning staff on alternatives that would meet neighborhood standards.
