Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Lot Coverage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
PLDRC deadlocks on large-lot coverage increase for Venetian Way property; motion fails
Summary
A request to raise maximum lot coverage from 35% to 42.18% for a new home failed after a 3–3 tie vote on April 17; applicant may appeal or accept denial.
Get email alerts on the Lot Coverage topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Planning and Land Development Regulation Commission on April 17 failed to approve an increase in allowable lot coverage for a proposed new single-family home on a Venetian Way lot after the vote ended in a 3–3 tie.
Why it matters: The request, if approved, would have allowed a new home to cover a larger share of the lot than current rules permit. Commissioners cited concerns about impervious-area impacts and whether a two-story design could instead meet coverage limits.
Staff said the existing home — built in 1963 and damaged by Hurricane Milton — meets setbacks but the proposed replacement would increase roofed area to about 4,282 square feet on a 10,151-square-foot parcel, raising lot coverage to 42.18%. Staff recommended denial, finding the application did not meet the five variance criteria; the applicant supplied neighborhood examples and said a single-story design was preferred for aesthetic reasons.
Commission action: Commissioner Frank Costa moved to approve the variance with three staff-recommended conditions; the applicant agreed to a single-story condition during discussion. After deliberation the board was split 3–3, which under PLDRC rules is considered a denial/technical failure. The applicant chose not to request a continuance and may appeal the decision to the Volusia County Council.
Quotes: “I am concerned about approving a variance with additional lot coverage without mitigating where surface water is going to go,” Commissioner Emily Bush said during debate.
Next steps: The applicant can (1) appeal to Volusia County Council, (2) propose reduced coverage or a different design that meets the code, or (3) request a continuance to return with additional evidence.

