Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Works Parking topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Council to reissue notices and resume Good State Parking Lot Phase 2 work after publication issue

3042704 · April 16, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

City staff told the council they will republish a resolution and declare intent to move forward on Phase 2 of the Good State Parking Lot project at Westridge after the previous run of notices did not meet the city’s publication requirements.

City staff told the council they will republish a resolution and declare intent to move forward on Phase 2 of the Good State Parking Lot project at Westridge after the previous run of notices did not meet the city’s publication requirements.

The matter is procedural but affects a public facility: staff said the southernmost part of the parking lot had at one time been held for possible conversion to tennis courts to serve a nearby high school, but that the city later worked out an alternate arrangement with the school district — a tennis complex at Highland Park — removing the need to reserve the parking area for that purpose. Phase 2 work would restore the lot to meet code and paving standards, staff said.

“We had not published appropriately and adequately. And so this is our attempt to fix that and move on,” a staff member said when explaining why the city is re-sending the resolution and declaring intent for Phase 2. The same staff member described the southern portion of the lot as previously constrained by an anticipated state interest in a tennis complex; the city later arranged for the tennis facilities at Highland Park, which “no longer necessitates the need to use that parking lot for a purpose of that nature.”

A staff member said the Phase 2 work will include replacing pavement lifts so the lot meets current code and the city’s paving standards. No contract awards, construction start dates, or project budgets were provided in the discussion, and the transcript records no formal vote to start construction. Councilors and staff discussed the need to correct the public-notice process before moving forward.

Staff did not specify the resolution number, the exact boundaries of Phase 2, or a construction timeline during the discussion. They said the republishing is intended to correct prior notice deficiencies and allow the city to proceed after proper notification.