Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Permitting And Inspections topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outlines permitting delays, inspection issues and McCormick Trails complications; water-zone changes affected fire-flow requirements
Summary
Staff told the Land Use Committee that public-works staffing shortages and project-management issues contributed to permit and inspection delays; McCormick Trails encountered fire-flow and shop-drawing mismatches after the 660-zone reservoir activation, prompting revisions and additional engineering reviews.
City staff briefed the Land Use Committee on April 16 about permitting and inspection delays and a series of construction issues at McCormick Trails and McCormick Village.
Nick Bond, community development director, said staffing shortages in Public Works — with one employee on military leave and another on part-time FMLA — had slowed coordination and lengthened permit timelines: "everything is just taking longer because there is so much less coordination"; staff said they were working to clear plan-review backlogs and route more applications to reviewers.
Jim Bisk explained specific complications at McCormick Trails and McCormick Village. He said divisions 13 and 14 in McCormick Trails moved into the 660 water-zone elevation and that the reservoir serving the 660 zone "was completed within the last 2 months." He described how the city had allowed some work to begin under earlier 580-zone fire-flow numbers and then the fire-flow changed after the 660 zone came online, which altered sprinkler requirements. Bisk said the city had permitted homes under one set of fire-flow numbers and later had to reconcile changed requirements, which created complications for builders.
Bisk also described inspection problems stemming from discrepancies between approved plans and precut-lumber shop drawings: "they were actually making changes to the plans on the shop drawings from what was approved by the city" and inspectors encountered differences in the field, such as planned clearances not matching actual construction. Staff said in some cases structural engineers provided letters addressing conditions, but "the engineer needs to give explicit authority for his stamp to be used more than once" and the city required plan revisions or engineering documentation for each building where needed.
Staff said McCormick's early efforts to accelerate lot deliveries created sequencing issues and additional project-management coordination needs. Committee members asked staff to circulate quarterly inspection totals to all council members for visibility. No formal action was taken at the meeting.
