Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Milton equestrian committee says short-term rentals not a good fit as a large-lot incentive
Summary
Staff reported five unregulated short-term rental listings in Milton and proposed strict registration requirements if the city were to allow them. Committee members and residents expressed concern that allowing rentals would harm rural character; the committee declined to pursue short-term rentals as a large-lot incentive.
Get email alerts on the Short Term Rentals topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Milton Equestrian Committee on April 16 considered whether short-term rentals should be offered as a large-lot preservation incentive and heard staff recommendations for a tightly regulated approach.
Diana Wheeler, interim community development director, told the committee that short-term rentals are currently prohibited by city code but unregulated listings appear on commercial platforms. “There are currently five rental properties listed in Milton,” Wheeler said, adding that four of those listings identify themselves as being in nearby Alpharetta to attract guests. Wheeler told the committee most of the listings are owner-occupied guest units or barns rather than standalone rental homes.
Staff outlined recommended regulatory controls that would apply if the city chose to allow rentals as an incentive for properties of three acres or more. Proposed requirements included an application and annual registration, a business license, a requirement that the property owner reside on the parcel, a maximum of six vehicles visible from the roadway, no parking in rights-of-way or front setbacks, a limit of two guests per bedroom (12 guests total), a requirement for local contact persons and revocation for properties generating repeat complaints.
Committee members and public commenters raised enforcement and character concerns. Mary Kronk, a Milton resident, said the possibility of frequent guest turnover could make large lots less desirable for buyers: “This may be a large lot disincentive,” she said. Several committee members questioned how the city would verify owner residency and how code enforcement would manage a detailed regulatory regime when staff currently have not cited the five known unpermitted listings in the absence of complaints.
Discussion also touched on the distinction between short-term rentals and permitted uses already in the code, such as bed and breakfasts and country inns (which require use permits and owner occupancy and are limited in size). Wheeler noted that bed-and-breakfast operations and country inns remain allowed with use permits and that the proposed short-term-rental standards were intentionally strict to address neighbor concerns.
By the end of the discussion, committee members expressed broad opposition to using short-term rentals as an incentive for preserving large lots, with several saying the use would not fit Milton’s rural character. The committee elected to skip the new-business item A formal consideration of short-term rentals, effectively declining to pursue them as an incentive at this time.

