Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Housing And Community Development topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Honolulu Council adopts 2026–2030 consolidated plan, authorizes submission to HUD

3029440 · April 17, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The City and County of Honolulu approved its 2026–2030 Consolidated Plan and the first-year action plan for CDBG, HOME, ESG, HOPWA and the Housing Trust Fund and authorized submitting the plans to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

The Honolulu City Council adopted Committee Report 108 and Resolution 20‑562 FD1, approving the City and County of Honolulu’s 2026–2030 Consolidated Plan and the first‑year action plan for the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), Emergency Solutions Grants (ESG), Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) and the Housing Trust Fund, and authorized submittal to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

Councilmember DeSantis Tam moved adoption of the committee report and resolution and later moved to amend the resolution to the posted FD1, citing the amendments in communications D278 and D286. There were no public testifiers on the item. The motion to amend was seconded, and the council then adopted the FD1 version; the clerk reported seven ayes and two members absent. No further discussion was recorded.

The action sends the consolidated plan and the first‑year action plan to HUD for review and aligns the city to seek federal funding through the listed programs during the 2026–2030 program period. The council record shows no objections or reservations to the amendment or final resolution. The resolution text as presented names the five federal/state programs above and explicitly authorizes submittal to HUD.

Members noted no public testimony and no additional instructions to staff were recorded during the item. The adoption followed the committee recommendation and the posted communications noted by the mover.