Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education And Small Schools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff outline new special‑education weights, small‑school and sparsity grants and related fiscal unknowns
Summary
Analysts briefed senators on changes in H.454 to pupil weights, special‑education funding, and supports for small and sparse districts, and on data and staffing work still required to convert the state's special‑education census block grant into a weighted foundation model.
Committee analysts described how H.454 would change the pupil weighting system that determines district funding under the proposed foundation model, and how supports for small and sparsely populated districts would be phased into the new structure.
Weights and how they would be used
Under the draft, the base per‑pupil amount (the statute shows $15,033 in the draft language) would be multiplied by a district's long‑term weighted membership to calculate each district's Education Opportunity Payment (EOP). The bill replaces the current tax‑capacity weights with additive foundation weights. The proposed weights include tiered English‑learner levels (several proficiency levels with different weights), an economically disadvantaged weight, and a set of special‑education weights organized into categories (including a category for multiple disabilities). Staff said the weights are additive (not multiplicative): a pupil eligible in multiple categories would add each applicable weight to the base.
Small school and sparsity supports
The bill preserves support for small‑by‑necessity schools and creates a sparsity grant for districts with low population density (the draft uses a threshold of about 55 residents per square mile as a determinant in current drafting). Small school and sparsity grants would be calculated by multiplying a two‑year average enrollment by a statutory cost adjustment and then adjusted for inflation. Committee staff noted that, because sparsity and small‑school determinations are made at the district level under the draft, district boundary choices will materially affect which schools and students receive extra support.
Special education funding changes
The bill eliminates the current special‑education census block grant and replaces it in the foundation model with special‑education weights (an "ABC"‑style approach discussed by staff). Extraordinary special‑education reimbursements would remain separate. JFO said it had not completed the full crosswalk between the existing block grant and the new weighted approach but will deliver additional analysis; staff warned that the net fiscal effect depends on the final design of the weights and assumptions about federal and local funding flows.
Administrative and staffing notes
Agency of Education staff and JFO analysts told the committee the new school construction program and some of the grants implied by the bill would likely require additional AOE positions; the bill asks AOE to report in December with more detail. Joint Fiscal Office staff and counsel also described multiple required reporting items (on transportation, inflation indices for the formula, and data collection) before full implementation can proceed.
Where the questions remain
Senators pressed staff on whether sparsity grants would apply to entire districts even if only part of a district is geographically sparse, and on whether the ABC special‑education model would fully replace the block grant. Staff said the draft applies sparsity at the district level and that JFO is still reconciling special‑education data to determine whether the new weighted model would cover currently covered expenses; more work is scheduled before the committee acts.
