Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rare Disease Advisory Council topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Lawmakers Hear Case for Vermont Rare Disease Advisory Council
Summary
Testimony from the ALS Association urged creation of a Rare Disease Advisory Council to improve diagnosis, care coordination and emergency planning for Vermonters with rare conditions; witnesses cited gaps in transportation, dental care and public-health coordination and noted the state’s new ALS registry.
Legislative committee members heard testimony urging creation of a Rare Disease Advisory Council to give Vermonters living with conditions such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis a formal channel to state government.
Danielle Spadafore, managing director of advocacy for the ALS Association, told the committee the council would “give a unified voice to Vermont state government” and urged the panel to move the bill swiftly. Spadafore said the ALS Association serves “about roughly 50 families in Vermont currently” and cited broader estimates that roughly 1 in 10 people live with a rare disease.
The witnesses told the committee the council would help address delays in diagnosis and difficulties accessing specialists and coordinated services in a largely rural state. “Time to diagnosis can still be 9 to 12 months,” Spadafore said, and small patient populations make it harder for state agencies to develop in-depth knowledge of the range of needs across rare conditions.
Karen Hammer Williamson, a social worker who manages care services for the ALS Association in Vermont and nearby New York counties, described how gaps in related services compound clinical needs. “One of the key treatments for preventing and reducing incidence of pneumonia is more frequent dental preventive dental care,” Williamson said, noting that many people with advanced or bulbar ALS need dentists able to provide care in chairs or with specialized supports. She said transportation limits and provider availability can force patients to choose between preventive and specialty appointments.
Williamson said she sees about 90 percent of Vermonters living with ALS and described additional concerns for emergency preparedness and coordination with Vermont Emergency Management. She said coordinated RDAC planning could reduce the workload across departments and improve responses for people with high-level disabilities in disasters and evacuations.
A committee member noted a state ALS registry and said the first public report found 27 new diagnoses in the prior year; witnesses praised the registry but said it is too early for trend conclusions. Spadafore told the committee the proposed council would join similar bodies already established in about 29 states, and witnesses said members of the rare-disease community would be willing to help with an initial staffing lift if the Department of Health agreed to support and coordinate the work.
Witnesses also raised ancillary concerns that emerged in testimony: some patients face homelessness while living with ALS, and privacy protections around medical-aid-in-dying cases can complicate interpretation of registry counts.
The session did not record a formal vote on the RDAC bill during this testimony. Committee members asked the witnesses for suggestions on membership and coordination; the hearing adjourned with the committee scheduled to return and vote later in the meeting on an item listed as “S.”
