Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Rezoning 615 S College topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Neighbors oppose rezoning request at 615 South College Street; Planning Commission denied recommendation
Summary
A public hearing on a request to rezone 615 South College Street from NC-20 to NC-14 drew multiple residents raising concerns about floodplain, wetlands, tree loss, traffic and neighborhood character. The Planning Commission had failed to recommend the rezoning by a 3-5 vote; the transcript does not record a final council vote on the rezoning.
Residents and neighborhood representatives on April 15 urged the Auburn City Council to deny a request to rezone 615 South College Street from Neighborhood Conservation-20 (NC-20) to Neighborhood Conservation-14 (NC-14), saying the smaller lot standard would be inconsistent with the street's character and could harm local waterways.
Multiple speakers, including Vienna Louise Katainen (550 South Gay Street), Corey Reynolds (representing the Tallinn Homeowners Association), Charlie McCurry (802 South Gay Street) and Paul Shrantz (563 South College Street), told the council the site sits at a low point on South College where a perennial stream and floodplain run through the property. Speakers said removing vegetation and placing more impervious surface on small lots would increase runoff, harm wildlife and require wetlands mitigation and stream buffer waivers.
Planning staff noted the Planning Commission had failed to recommend approval by a vote of 3 to 5 at its March 20 meeting. Staff and the applicant's representative, Hayes Iford of Sanford Group, told the council that any future subdivision or site plan would have to comply with the city's water-resource regulations, FEMA/federal requirements and any required wetland mitigation or mitigation credits; the applicant said they had no intent to unlawfully impact wetlands and that they would work through required mitigation and design constraints.
Council members asked staff technical questions about buffers, streamside setbacks and whether mitigation credits are purchased through a bank; staff said wetlands and stream mitigation credits are typically acquired from established banks and that federal agencies handle certain permitting and floodplain determinations. Staff also reminded council and the public that rezoning consideration is separate from subdivision and site-plan review and that several aspects cannot be fully assessed without a formal plat or site plan.
Speakers raised traffic and driveway-concurrency concerns: opponents said multiple homes sharing a single common driveway would create safety and congestion issues on a street that council members described as a gateway into Auburn. Staff indicated that, under current zoning and subdivision rules, the lots could be subdivided by right into a total of four houses across two parcels without a council rezoning, and that much of the detailed engineering and safety review would occur during subdivision processing.
The transcript records the public hearing, extensive public comment and council questions, and confirms the Planning Commission's 3-5 failure to recommend. The excerpt does not contain a final recorded vote by the City Council on the rezoning request.
